Skadi Forum

Welcome to Skadi Forum, the largest Germanic online community forum where you can join over 45,000 members from around the world discussing all things of concern to you. To gain full access to Skadi Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Participate in over 100 topic forums and browse from over 800,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other members from around the world.
  • Post your own images and documents or access from over 70,000 files.
  • Gain access to special insider forums not available to guests.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. If you have questions about the permissible content, please read the Skadi Forum disclaimer and the Skadi Forum rules.

Go Back   Skadi Forum > > Psychology, Behavior & Neuroscience
Register FAQ Rules Donate Arcade Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Psychology, Behavior & Neuroscience Forum dedicated to the mental processes and behavior, the emotional and behavioral characteristics or attitude of an individual or group and all phenomena of the mind, the conscious self and beyond.

Consumption Makes Us Sad? Science Says We Can Be Happy With Less

Thread Tools
Old Tuesday, January 24th, 2012   #1
„Friend of Germanics”
Skadi Funding Member
Hersir's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Status: Available
Ethnicity: Håløyg
Ancestry: Norway
Subrace: Nordid
Y-DNA: I2b1
mtDNA: J2a1a1b
Country: Norway
State: Nordland
Location: Ireland
Gender: Male
Age: 30
Zodiac Sign: Pisces
Personality: INTP (The Architect)
Family: Married
Occupation: Technology
Politics: Galactic Lebensraum
Posts: 5,733
Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.Hersir is a deity.

Consumption Makes Us Sad? Science Says We Can Be Happy With Less

Are all those holiday gifts still giving you a thrill? If not, you may be experiencing what psychologists call hedonic adaptation. By Barry Schwartz

How much stuff is enough stuff? At what point should we worry a bit less about getting and spending and devote more time and energy to other things? As government austerity measures, shrinking incomes, and postholiday bills make us feel the squeeze on our wallets, it’s an especially good time to ask questions like these. The holidays should be putting us in mind to savor our close relations with friends and family and to ask ourselves what we can do to ease the burdens of others. Instead they seem mostly to add stress. Gift buying adds to our to-do lists even though our plates are already overfull of other responsibilities and our bank accounts, in these hard times, are perilously close to empty. The holidays should be a time of joy, but they seem, increasingly, to be a time of misery.

It may seem as though “how much is enough” is a very individual question. But it turns out that psychology has a good deal to offer us in the way of an answer. Psychology has developed a pretty rich understanding of what it is that produces happiness—what is sometimes called life satisfaction or subjective well being. And for the most part, what produces happiness isn’t stuff. People thrive when they have a network of close relations to others and when they have meaningful work that they find engaging. Stuff just doesn’t do it. And one major reason stuff doesn’t do it is a pervasive phenomenon known as hedonic adaptation.

Hedonic adaptation is just a fancy label for what we already know: we get used to things. The new car gets us all excited—for a while. But before long, it’s just our ride. The new tablet or smartphone is so enticing that we can’t keep our hands off it. But before long, it’s just another way for people we don’t want to hear from to lay responsibilities on us. There’s no denying that we get tremendous pleasure from the things we have. But the pleasure is disappointingly short-lived. And although this adaptation happens to us again and again, we never seem to learn to anticipate it. The result is that even when we get exactly what we want, we often end up disappointed.

The reality of the things we have doesn’t live up to our expectations. Some have suggested that adaptation creates what might be called a hedonic treadmill. We run faster and faster, but don’t seem to get anywhere.

Greg Martin, of San Diego, California, cleans out the home of his late mother, who suffered from hoarding on April, 8, 2011., Sandy Huffaker / Corbis

Why don’t we learn from past disappointments? One possibility has been suggested by economist Robert Frank. In several books, Frank has observed that often when we seek things, pleasure is beside the point. Sometimes, we seek things just to have a little bit more than our neighbors. We have a concern for status—for relative position. So even if the thrill of driving our Mercedes doesn’t last, the thrill of comparing it to our neighbor’s Civic may. It may not make us feel very good about ourselves to acknowledge that we get pleasure from status, but we do. And we may have a hard time suppressing status concern without some outside help. The help that Frank suggests is a tax on consumption (basically on earnings minus savings). If the tax is high enough, it may make status concern just expensive enough for us to suppress it.

And what would we do if we stopped acquiring stuff? Here, too, research in psychology has something valuable to offer. It seems that most of us get more pleasure out of doing than out of having. Though the line between “doing” and “having” is not always a bright one (for example, is the $5,000 ski trip “having” or “doing”?) Leaf Van Boven, Tom Gilovich, and their collaborators have shown that doing satisfies us more than having does. In reflecting on the past or contemplating the future, people are happier when they have experiences on their minds than when they have things on their minds. And the higher a person’s income is, the bigger the disparity between the joys of doing and the joys of having. Moreover, we don’t adapt to doing to the same degree that we adapt to having. The museum trip, the hike, the bike ride in the hills, the informal dinner with friends keep satisfying long after the Mercedes has stopped providing a thrill. And a great thing about at least some “doing” is that it doesn’t cost much money. Furthermore, people seem to get an extra shot of well-being juice when they do things that serve others rather than themselves. The pleasures associated with our own acts of consumption tend to be short-lived. The pleasures derived from doing something for others linger.

There are several possible reasons why doing does more for us than having. First, though doing is just an episode in life, we continue to “consume” the things we do by remembering them, and sharing our memories with others. Second, doing is almost always social, and I’ve already indicated how important social relations are to well being. Doing things together with others may actually strengthen social ties, and because our social relations are much less predictable than our relations with stuff (the Mercedes doesn’t change from day to day, or behave weirdly as we drive to work), we are less likely to adapt to our activities. In one study, strangers were brought together to discuss either things they had or things they did. Discussion of activities led to a more positive impression of ones discussion partner and greater enjoyment of the conversation itself than discussion of things. Third, doing seems to constitute a more meaningful part of our personal identity than having does. Now, we all know people who “are what they own.” But there is reliable research indicating that people who are like that—people who have what we might call materialist values—are less satisfied with their lives than people who don’t. This is true even of materialists who are financially successful. And by the way, as people age, doing seems increasingly to dominate having as a goal. This may be a key part of the “wisdom of aging,” and may help explain why, despite persistent aches and pains in recalcitrant body parts, older people are happier than younger ones.

The new car gets us all excited—for a while. But before long, it’s just our ride.

The lesson in all this research is that prioritizing what we do over what we have will lead to greater satisfaction with our lives. The implications of this lesson are very broad indeed. For example, when it comes to holiday gifts, people should think seriously about giving something of themselves instead of buying gifts. Give the people you love the gift of time, doing something together you will both cherish. (Your teenage children may not consider this much of a gift, but your mother will.) Rake your neighbor’s leaves instead of giving him a case of beer. Take your kids to the aquarium instead of shopping for the latest videogame. For Valentine’s Day, cook your partner a meal instead of buying a camera or a heart-shaped box of chocolates. Not only will both donor and recipient be more satisfied, but the time you spend doing things together will be time you don’t spend fighting crowds in the mall. And the gift you give will be remembered.

More important, a focus on what you do rather than what you have may change the way in which you evaluate job opportunities. Though most of us probably say that meaningful, engaging work is more important to us than highly compensated work, it’s not clear that we actually choose on that basis. We should. And our employers should bear this in mind as well. If they make the tasks we face every day challenging, meaningful, and engaging, we’ll be much more satisfied doing them. And as Barbara Fredrickson has shown, happy people do better work than unhappy ones.

Thus, whatever minor inefficiencies might be introduced by giving employees some discretion and control over their work will probably be more than compensated for by work that is high quality, done by people who are highly motivated. And for the tiny handful of workers who still have some leverage in negotiating with employers, it should be born in mind that working conditions may be much more important to their satisfaction with their jobs than a bump in salary and benefits.

A final point. I suspect that there is little in what I’ve written that people don’t already know. This suggests either that people don’t need to be told, or that telling people is a waste of time because they just can’t help themselves when it comes to acquiring more stuff. It does seem to me, however, that the economic crisis of recent years may provide us with a unique opportunity to encourage people to recalibrate their aims and aspirations.

For the foreseeable future, acquiring the means for buying things is going to be much more effortful than it was just a few short years ago. As Rahm Emanuel said when the financial crisis began, “we should never let a crisis go to waste.” Crises are opportunities for people, as well as governments, to do big things. And the big things that we as individuals can do center on reminding ourselves of what is really important and satisfying in our lives, and aiming to achieve those things instead of a Mercedes in our driveways.

"A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone. "
-Henry David Thoreau
Hersir is offline Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Hersir For This Useful Post:
Old Tuesday, January 24th, 2012   #2
Funding Member
„Friend of Germanics”
Skadi Funding Member
Sven's Avatar
Last Seen: Wednesday, February 1st, 2017
Join Date: Feb 2011
Ethnicity: German
Country: Germany
Gender: Male
Posts: 125
Sven is noble of speech.Sven is noble of speech.

"Things you own end up owning you" - Tyler Durden
Sven is offline Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Sven For This Useful Post:
Old Tuesday, January 24th, 2012   #3
Van Wellenkamp
Senior Member
Van Wellenkamp's Avatar
Last Seen: Friday, August 24th, 2012
Join Date: Jun 2011
Status: Available
Ethnicity: German
Ancestry: German, Danish, English
Country: United States
State: Florida
Location: Pensacola
Gender: Male
Age: 48
Family: Married
Occupation: Diver
Politics: Libertarian/Anarchicst
Religion: Lutheran
Posts: 322
Van Wellenkamp has earned the respect of peers.

Thureau was dead on. Less is more.
Van Wellenkamp is offline Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Van Wellenkamp For This Useful Post:
Old Saturday, April 14th, 2012   #4
Account Inactive
Last Seen: Monday, July 9th, 2012
Join Date: Apr 2012
Status: Available
Ethnicity: Norwegian
Ancestry: Swedish, Norwegian
Subrace: Dinaricized-Nordeby
Country: United States
Gender: Male
Family: Youth
Religion: Atheist
Posts: 47
Hrodebert 's reputation has not travelled afar.

Better to want what you have rather than have what you want.

I've always been content with merely having my basic needs met, never felt a biological urge for anything more, and I've always been happy with my physical and mental health.

I spend most of my time on creative endeavors and internal development. I see no point in focusing externally on worthless peacock feathers.

And IF there's a part of us that continues on in life long after the body ceases, why would someone neglect that part in favor of the lesser, perishable.. ? Why invest in that which yields nothing, regardless of one's beliefs? If one with an empty mind were to be stripped of flesh and bone, what would ultimately be left?

Can't fill an empty life with empty things.
Hrodebert is offline Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sad State of Math and Science Education Hersir Articles & Current Affairs 0 Friday, October 1st, 2010 10:40 PM
Alcohol Consumption Northern Paladin Health, Fitness & Nutrition 183 Saturday, August 14th, 2010 04:16 PM
Is Science Racist? Liberals Want to Drop Science Classes Out of Germania Immigration & Race Relations 1 Wednesday, January 27th, 2010 02:40 PM
What Makes You HAPPY! SuuT Psychology, Behavior & Neuroscience 51 Sunday, March 18th, 2007 12:12 AM
What Makes You Sad? SuuT Psychology, Behavior & Neuroscience 21 Thursday, October 12th, 2006 08:58 PM

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Copyright ©2000 - 2017,
Except where otherwise noted, all content on this site is licensed.
[ Disclaimer ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Statement ]

Powered by  Creative Commons License

Page generated in 0.82184 seconds with 13 queries