Welcome to Skadi Forum, the largest
Germanic online community forum where you can join over 45,000 members from around
the world discussing all things of concern to you. To gain full access to
Skadi Forum you must register for a free
account. As a registered member you will be able to:
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. If you have questions about the permissible content, please read the Skadi Forum disclaimer and the Skadi Forum rules.
|Register||FAQ||Rules||Donate||Arcade||Members List||Search||Today's Posts||Mark Forums Read|
|Questions About Germanics (Guest Section) Want to learn something about Germanics? Post your questions here. Guest posting is enabled. Please note that guest posts are moderated.|
||Thread Tools||Rate Thread|
|Thursday, April 13th, 2017||#51|
Last Seen: 17 Hours Ago
Join Date: Jan 2017
Ethnicity: Primal Norse pan-Germanist
Ancestry: Norway, Germany, Denmark
Family: Married parent
Occupation: many jobs
Politics: Primal Natural Survivalist
The way I look at it, these terms are interchangeable for us ethnic-spiritualist conscious peoples of Germanic ancestry. But the 2 terms have evolved with different meanings over time. Originally it was geographic with Nordic referring to a region and Germanic is an adjective for language, culture, phenotype, etc. But with romanticism, nationalism, and eugenics ideas of Nordid blood and phenotypes were layered on top. But I suppose today "Nordic" is not only cultural (referring to some raceless welfare state idea) but also geographic (look at the Nordic Council). This is why I see Finns often called Scandinavian or Nordic despite not being Germanic.
To me, if our main way of identifying is blood then Germanic and Nordic should be one in the same.
|Saturday, May 27th, 2017||#52|
Last Seen: Thursday, June 1st, 2017
Join Date: Jul 2010
Ancestry: Germany, Saarland
Country: South Africa
State: Cape Province
Family: Single adult
Politics: None, really-open minded.
I never thought there was much of a historical difference.
The Germanic tribes lived more inland, those by the coast were called "Norsemen", and the few who went to sea were called "Vikings".
|The Following User Says Thank You to Friedrich For This Useful Post:|
|Friday, July 28th, 2017||#53|
Last Seen: 2 Weeks Ago
Join Date: Jul 2017
Religion: Native European Spirituality
I understand that the origins of Germanic culture and language lie in Southern Scandinavia during the Nordic Bronze Age (which of course developed from the common Indo-European culture & language that expanded all throughout Europe during the Bronze Age). In my view the original Germanic culture that developed during the Bronze Age is Nordic and vise versa. Only later did Germanic and Nordic begin to diverge a bit. That's my understanding at least.
Modern day Germanics have branched off linguistically but are still more or less the same people genetically/racially. Although in countries such as Germany (particularly Southern Germany), Austria, The Netherlands, and Switzerland the Germanic tribes must have absorbed more Celtic tribes than Germanics who stayed further North. But it appears that some Celts from the British Isles were likely taken back to Scandinavia during the Viking Age which doesn't surprise me.
|Rate This Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Why Are the Irish Not Considered Germanic/Nordic?||Fionn||Germanic Diaspora, Enclaves & Influences||540||Tuesday, August 29th, 2017 11:14 PM|
|Are Flat Brachycephalic Peoples Mentally Superior to the Dolichocephalic Nordic/Germanic Peoples?||Nordish||Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation||0||Tuesday, January 25th, 2011 07:06 PM|
|Beauty Pagent Based on Germanic/Nordic Features||Alpine Storm||Fashion & Beauty||0||Thursday, September 14th, 2006 06:56 AM|